Seek Returns logo

SW vs. TXRH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SW and TXRH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSWTXRH
Company NameSmurfit Westrock PlcTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization17.75 billion USD11.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 17, 2008October 5, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SW and TXRH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SW vs. TXRH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSWTXRH
5-Day Price Return-3.41%3.47%
13-Week Price Return-19.68%-3.18%
26-Week Price Return-25.42%-12.16%
52-Week Price Return-32.75%-16.57%
Month-to-Date Return-7.12%2.30%
Year-to-Date Return-36.33%-7.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.67M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.50M1.10M
3-Month Volatility38.68%23.79%
Beta1.040.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SW

5.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TXRH

30.92%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

TXRH’s Return on Equity of 30.92% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

2.06%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 2.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TXRH

7.49%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

TXRH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

5.23%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.23% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TXRH

8.85%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

TXRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.85% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSWTXRH
Return on Equity (TTM)5.12%30.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.05%13.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.06%7.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.23%8.85%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.81%65.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.48

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TXRH

0.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

TXRH’s Current Ratio of 0.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SW

0.77

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TXRH

0.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, TXRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TXRH

69.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 69.12, TXRH demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSWTXRH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.480.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.970.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.4169.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

SW vs. TXRH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SW vs. TXRH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SW

4.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 4.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TXRH

1.59%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.59% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SW

63.96%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.96% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TXRH

40.30%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TXRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.30% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSWTXRH
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.71%1.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.96%40.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SW

19.17

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.17 places SW in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TXRH

25.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

TXRH’s P/E Ratio of 25.34 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SW

0.39

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.39 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TXRH

1.90

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

TXRH’s P/S Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TXRH

7.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

TXRH’s P/B Ratio of 7.56 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SW vs. TXRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSWTXRH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.1725.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.391.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.217.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.9532.51