Seek Returns logo

SW vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SW and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSWTPR
Company NameSmurfit Westrock PlcTapestry, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization21.90 billion USD20.58 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 2008October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SW and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SW vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSWTPR
5-Day Price Return-4.05%3.32%
13-Week Price Return-9.57%20.03%
26-Week Price Return-23.24%14.12%
52-Week Price Return-3.54%143.64%
Month-to-Date Return-5.48%-8.48%
Year-to-Date Return-22.11%51.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.11M5.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.61M4.18M
3-Month Volatility31.62%46.94%
Beta1.101.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSWTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)2.94%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.17%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.18%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.20%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSWTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.451.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.951.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.792.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.413.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

SW vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SW vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SW

3.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TPR

1.46%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSWTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.87%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SW

41.59

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 41.59, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TPR

111.89

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 111.89, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SW

0.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TPR

2.92

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SW vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSWTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.59111.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.492.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.2321.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.0719.15