Seek Returns logo

SUZ vs. VMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SUZ and VMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VMC is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolSUZVMC
Company NameSuzano S.A.Vulcan Materials Company
CountryBrazilUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryPaper & Forest ProductsConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization12.11 billion USD38.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 4, 2008February 21, 1973
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SUZ and VMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SUZ vs. VMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSUZVMC
5-Day Price Return0.23%1.00%
13-Week Price Return2.53%7.77%
26-Week Price Return-8.82%15.14%
52-Week Price Return-6.74%16.14%
Month-to-Date Return0.88%6.00%
Year-to-Date Return-14.84%13.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.93M0.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.46M0.99M
3-Month Volatility23.69%19.70%
Beta0.470.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.82%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.14%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-1.81%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VMC

11.70%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

VMC’s Return on Equity of 11.70% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
18.06%
Q3
11.46%
Median
3.39%
Q1
1.84%
Min
-2.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VMC

12.52%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

VMC’s Net Profit Margin of 12.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
16.36%
Median
6.08%
Q1
4.04%
Min
-2.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VMC

18.90%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.90% places VMC in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSUZVMC
Return on Equity (TTM)20.16%11.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.94%5.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.26%12.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.63%18.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.73%27.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.03
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.99

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VMC

1.67

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

VMC’s Current Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.82
Median
0.56
Q1
0.27
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VMC

0.59

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

VMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
2.72
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

VMC

7.88

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

VMC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSUZVMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.161.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.471.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.280.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.537.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

SUZ vs. VMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SUZ vs. VMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SUZ

3.79%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.72%
Median
2.41%
Q1
1.71%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VMC

0.66%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

VMC’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
495.87%
Q3
219.88%
Median
83.21%
Q1
24.91%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VMC

26.53%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

VMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.53% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSUZVMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.79%0.66%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.16%26.53%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SUZ

8.48

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
36.56
Q3
23.55
Median
16.47
Q1
13.85
Min
5.22

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 8.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VMC

40.46

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 40.46 places VMC in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SUZ

1.29

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.30
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.30

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VMC

5.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.07, VMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.25
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.25

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VMC

4.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 4.10, VMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SUZ vs. VMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Paper & Forest Products and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSUZVMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.4840.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.295.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.504.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.5335.04