Seek Returns logo

STN vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STN and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

STN is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolSTNZTO
Company NameStantec Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryCanadaChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization12.43 billion USD15.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 2005October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STN and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STN vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTNZTO
5-Day Price Return0.75%1.44%
13-Week Price Return-0.08%4.68%
26-Week Price Return25.47%-5.14%
52-Week Price Return38.00%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return0.54%4.91%
Year-to-Date Return33.08%-2.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.45M2.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.29M2.59M
3-Month Volatility19.69%37.71%
Beta0.990.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

13.99%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 13.99% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZTO

18.81%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 18.81% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

23.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTNZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)15.34%13.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.37%9.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.10%18.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.22%23.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%27.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.21

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.29

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTNZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.291.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)60.60--

Growth

Revenue Growth

STN vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STN vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTNZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.57%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.30%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STN

39.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 39.20 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZTO

12.20

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.20 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STN

2.78

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZTO

2.29

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZTO

1.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.59 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STN vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTNZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.2012.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.782.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.381.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.2910.17