Seek Returns logo

STN vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STN and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSTNVRT
Company NameStantec Inc.Vertiv Holdings Co
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization12.64 billion USD48.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 2005August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STN and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STN vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTNVRT
5-Day Price Return4.56%-7.16%
13-Week Price Return9.65%21.58%
26-Week Price Return40.17%14.56%
52-Week Price Return33.19%61.52%
Month-to-Date Return1.18%-13.48%
Year-to-Date Return35.88%10.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.37M6.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.28M7.63M
3-Month Volatility15.97%40.32%
Beta1.001.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTNVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)15.34%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.37%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.10%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.22%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTNVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.291.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)60.602.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

STN vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STN vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTNVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.57%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.30%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STN

38.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 38.90, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTNVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.9059.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.765.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.3815.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.0839.11