Seek Returns logo

STN vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STN and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSTNUPS
Company NameStantec Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization12.90 billion USD73.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 2005November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STN and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STN vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTNUPS
5-Day Price Return2.22%0.79%
13-Week Price Return3.63%-15.57%
26-Week Price Return27.20%-13.85%
52-Week Price Return37.84%-34.26%
Month-to-Date Return3.42%3.26%
Year-to-Date Return37.64%-31.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M7.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.29M7.21M
3-Month Volatility19.41%28.61%
Beta1.011.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTNUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)15.34%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.37%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.10%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.22%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTNUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.291.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.691.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)60.609.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

STN vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STN vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STN

0.55%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UPS

7.33%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTNUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%7.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.30%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STN

40.55

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 40.55 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UPS

12.85

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.85 is within the middle range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STN

2.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.43 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

STN vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTNUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.5512.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.880.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.385.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.2313.70