Seek Returns logo

STN vs. TRU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STN and TRU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSTNTRU
Company NameStantec Inc.TransUnion
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringProfessional Services
Market Capitalization12.15 billion USD17.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 2005June 25, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STN and TRU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STN vs. TRU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTNTRU
5-Day Price Return-0.40%-2.55%
13-Week Price Return5.18%-4.47%
26-Week Price Return35.70%-12.46%
52-Week Price Return32.54%-6.25%
Month-to-Date Return-1.66%-7.81%
Year-to-Date Return32.06%-5.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.34M1.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.27M2.13M
3-Month Volatility15.63%35.70%
Beta0.981.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRU

9.04%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRU’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TRU

8.99%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

TRU’s Net Profit Margin of 8.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TRU

17.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

TRU’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.39% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTNTRU
Return on Equity (TTM)15.34%9.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.37%3.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.10%8.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.22%17.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%59.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRU

2.03

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRU’s Current Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRU

1.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

TRU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TRU

2.99

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTNTRU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.292.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.691.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)60.602.99

Growth

Revenue Growth

STN vs. TRU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STN vs. TRU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRU

0.50%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRU

22.05%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.05% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTNTRU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.57%0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.30%22.05%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STN

38.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 38.90, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TRU

43.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 43.69 places TRU in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TRU

3.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

TRU’s P/S Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TRU

3.80

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRU’s P/B Ratio of 3.80 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STN vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTNTRU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.9043.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.763.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.383.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.0833.40