STN vs. SYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at STN and SYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	STN	SYM
Company Name	Stantec Inc.	Symbotic Inc.
Country	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Machinery
Market Capitalization	12.90 billion USD	40.64 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	August 5, 2005	March 9, 2021
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STN and SYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STN vs. SYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	STN	SYM
5-Day Price Return	2.22%	8.19%
13-Week Price Return	3.63%	45.95%
26-Week Price Return	27.20%	277.36%
52-Week Price Return	37.84%	190.18%
Month-to-Date Return	3.42%	27.70%
Year-to-Date Return	37.64%	190.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.27M	1.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.29M	2.28M
3-Month Volatility	19.41%	82.41%
Beta	1.01	2.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	STN	SYM
Return on Equity (TTM)	15.34%	-7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.37%	-0.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.10%	-0.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.22%	-5.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	54.44%	16.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SYM

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	STN	SYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.26	0.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.69	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	60.60	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

STN vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STN vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STN

0.55%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	STN	SYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.55%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.30%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STN

40.55

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

A P/E Ratio of 40.55 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SYM

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STN

2.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SYM

18.43

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 18.43, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	STN	SYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	40.55	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.88	18.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.38	108.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	28.23	84.63