Seek Returns logo

STLA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STLA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

STLA is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolSTLAVIPS
Company NameStellantis N.V.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryNetherlandsChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization31.00 billion USD10.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 9, 2010March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STLA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STLA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTLAVIPS
5-Day Price Return11.52%6.34%
13-Week Price Return0.79%35.42%
26-Week Price Return-15.89%29.46%
52-Week Price Return-28.95%17.34%
Month-to-Date Return12.11%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return-29.98%50.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume37.41M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.65M2.84M
3-Month Volatility47.74%29.15%
Beta1.630.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTLAVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-3.09%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.17%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.64%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.88%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.74%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTLAVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.751.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.560.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.73150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

STLA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STLA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STLA

5.93%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.93%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTLAVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.93%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)82.70%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

VIPS

10.35

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STLA

0.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

STLA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTLAVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--10.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.230.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.341.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.72--