Seek Returns logo

STLA vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at STLA and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSTLATPR
Company NameStellantis N.V.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization28.68 billion USD20.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 9, 2010October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of STLA and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

STLA vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSTLATPR
5-Day Price Return3.97%0.56%
13-Week Price Return-5.66%24.66%
26-Week Price Return-35.63%10.38%
52-Week Price Return-41.33%145.13%
Month-to-Date Return11.37%-8.85%
Year-to-Date Return-31.33%50.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.56M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume23.55M4.09M
3-Month Volatility46.27%46.48%
Beta1.681.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSTLATPR
Return on Equity (TTM)-3.09%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.17%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.64%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.88%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.74%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSTLATPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.751.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.562.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.733.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

STLA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

STLA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

STLA

6.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.09%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TPR

1.46%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSTLATPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.09%1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)82.70%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

TPR

111.89

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 111.89, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

STLA

0.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.22 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TPR

2.92

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STLA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSTLATPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--111.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.222.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.3421.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.6519.15