Seek Returns logo

SPOT vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SPOT and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSPOTUBER
Company NameSpotify Technology S.A.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryLuxembourgUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization138.85 billion USD207.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 3, 2018May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SPOT and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SPOT vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSPOTUBER
5-Day Price Return-4.60%2.76%
13-Week Price Return-6.56%2.73%
26-Week Price Return20.83%42.13%
52-Week Price Return85.91%33.10%
Month-to-Date Return-3.33%1.34%
Year-to-Date Return50.82%64.59%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.68M14.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.81M18.52M
3-Month Volatility39.47%28.35%
Beta1.671.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SPOT

14.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

SPOT’s Return on Equity of 14.00% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SPOT

4.85%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

SPOT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SPOT

11.11%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

SPOT’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.11% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSPOTUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)14.00%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.62%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.85%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.11%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.63%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SPOT

1.47

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

SPOT’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SPOT

0.36

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

SPOT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SPOT

38.25

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

SPOT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.25 is in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSPOTUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.460.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.25-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

SPOT vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SPOT vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSPOTUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SPOT

146.29

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

At 146.29, SPOT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

16.43

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 16.43 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SPOT

7.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

SPOT’s P/S Ratio of 7.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 4.38, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SPOT

20.39

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

SPOT’s P/B Ratio of 20.39 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SPOT vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSPOTUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)146.2916.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.104.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.398.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.8124.29