Seek Returns logo

SONY vs. WIT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SONY and WIT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both SONY and WIT are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolSONYWIT
Company NameSony Group CorporationWipro Limited
CountryJapanIndia
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesIT Services
Market Capitalization169.87 billion USD29.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 19, 2000
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SONY and WIT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SONY vs. WIT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSONYWIT
5-Day Price Return0.91%2.71%
13-Week Price Return15.52%1.43%
26-Week Price Return23.78%-17.85%
52-Week Price Return13.72%-2.21%
Month-to-Date Return14.64%2.25%
Year-to-Date Return25.29%-15.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume16.47M8.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.24M10.53M
3-Month Volatility30.48%19.72%
Beta1.340.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WIT

15.98%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

WIT’s Return on Equity of 15.98% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WIT

15.08%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.08% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WIT

16.91%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.91% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSONYWIT
Return on Equity (TTM)14.17%15.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.26%10.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.13%15.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.68%16.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.29%30.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WIT

2.40

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

WIT’s Current Ratio of 2.40 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WIT

0.18

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

WIT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WIT

--

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for WIT is currently unavailable.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSONYWIT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.092.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.032.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)104.18--

Growth

Revenue Growth

SONY vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SONY vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WIT

0.20%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WIT’s Dividend Yield of 0.20% is consistent with its peers in the IT Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WIT

175.79%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 175.79%, WIT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the IT Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSONYWIT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%0.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.52%175.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WIT

19.13

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

WIT’s P/E Ratio of 19.13 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WIT

2.89

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

WIT’s P/S Ratio of 2.89 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WIT

3.21

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

WIT’s P/B Ratio of 3.21 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSONYWIT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.2119.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.032.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.773.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.6616.54