Seek Returns logo

SONY vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SONY and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both SONY and UMC are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolSONYUMC
Company NameSony Group CorporationUnited Microelectronics Corporation
CountryJapanTaiwan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization175.85 billion USD18.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973September 19, 2000
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SONY and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SONY vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSONYUMC
5-Day Price Return3.35%3.76%
13-Week Price Return15.95%3.64%
26-Week Price Return13.15%2.24%
52-Week Price Return13.72%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return4.31%12.47%
Year-to-Date Return26.42%5.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.73M67.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.63M46.94M
3-Month Volatility32.88%19.91%
Beta1.310.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UMC

10.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.76% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

SONY’s Net Profit Margin of 9.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UMC

16.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 16.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UMC

19.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSONYUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)14.17%10.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.26%7.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.13%16.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.68%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.29%29.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UMC

1.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

UMC’s Current Ratio of 1.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UMC

0.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.20 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSONYUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.031.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)104.18313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

SONY vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SONY vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SONY

0.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UMC

6.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 6.57% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UMC

163.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.64% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSONYUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%6.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.52%163.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SONY

22.69

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 22.69 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UMC

14.43

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 14.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SONY

2.07

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UMC

2.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UMC

1.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SONY vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSONYUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.6914.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.072.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.771.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.9315.59