Seek Returns logo

SONY vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SONY and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolSONYUBER
Company NameSony Group CorporationUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryJapanUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization168.52 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SONY and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SONY vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSONYUBER
5-Day Price Return0.92%2.55%
13-Week Price Return15.46%1.37%
26-Week Price Return19.67%16.74%
52-Week Price Return13.72%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return13.20%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return23.72%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.73M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.80M20.55M
3-Month Volatility31.61%29.59%
Beta1.331.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSONYUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)14.17%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.26%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.13%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.68%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.29%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSONYUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)104.18-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

SONY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SONY vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSONYUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.52%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SONY vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSONYUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.2115.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.034.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.778.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.6622.90