Seek Returns logo

SNY vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SNY and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SNY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TEM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolSNYTEM
Company NameSanofiTempus AI, Inc.
CountryFranceUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization123.63 billion USD13.19 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 1, 2002June 14, 2024
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNY and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNY vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSNYTEM
5-Day Price Return2.06%3.86%
13-Week Price Return-5.87%28.10%
26-Week Price Return-15.27%-11.45%
52-Week Price Return-13.51%17.62%
Month-to-Date Return10.78%34.12%
Year-to-Date Return-6.83%124.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.33M15.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M12.32M
3-Month Volatility24.71%79.97%
Beta0.723.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNY

14.92%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

SNY’s Return on Equity of 14.92% is on par with the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNY

20.51%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.51% places SNY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNY

19.08%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

SNY’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.08% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSNYTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.92%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.49%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.51%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.08%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.85%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNY

1.27

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

SNY’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNY

0.32

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

SNY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNY

22.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

SNY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSNYTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.271.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.941.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.322.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.06-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNY vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNY vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNY

4.56%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.56%, SNY offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNY

52.56%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SNY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.56% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSNYTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.56%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)52.56%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNY

9.57

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, SNY’s P/E Ratio of 9.57 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNY

1.96

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

SNY’s P/S Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM

13.37

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

With a P/S Ratio of 13.37, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNY

1.44

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

SNY’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SNY vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSNYTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.57--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.9613.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.4435.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.47--