SNOW vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at SNOW and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	SNOW	UI
Company Name	Snowflake Inc.	Ubiquiti Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry	IT Services	Communications Equipment
Market Capitalization	66.86 billion USD	31.72 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 16, 2020	October 14, 2011
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNOW and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNOW vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	UI
5-Day Price Return	2.93%	34.24%
13-Week Price Return	-2.89%	29.27%
26-Week Price Return	12.65%	63.86%
52-Week Price Return	69.82%	154.69%
Month-to-Date Return	-10.34%	20.40%
Year-to-Date Return	29.78%	57.96%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.93M	0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.52M	0.12M
3-Month Volatility	32.44%	75.14%
Beta	1.23	1.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNOW

-44.88%

IT Services Industry

Max: 29.51%
Q3: 16.98%
Median: 13.47%
Q1: 7.93%
Min: -3.97%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -44.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UI

217.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 32.05%
Q3: 19.58%
Median: 11.77%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: -11.93%

UI’s Return on Equity of 217.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-36.43%

IT Services Industry

Max: 19.82%
Q3: 11.49%
Median: 6.67%
Q1: 3.61%
Min: -4.62%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -36.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UI

23.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 23.65%
Q3: 14.32%
Median: 5.31%
Q1: 1.45%
Min: -12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.64% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-41.37%

IT Services Industry

Max: 21.69%
Q3: 14.50%
Median: 10.06%
Q1: 6.98%
Min: 0.06%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UI

30.71%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 42.27%
Q3: 18.90%
Median: 6.21%
Q1: 2.97%
Min: -20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.71% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	UI
Return on Equity (TTM)	-44.88%	217.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-17.30%	45.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-36.43%	23.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-41.37%	30.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	66.58%	42.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

1.58

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.42
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.47
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.44

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UI

1.39

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 1.72
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.93

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

0.94

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UI

0.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.55
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 144.50
Q3: 84.49
Median: 13.76
Q1: 2.59
Min: -28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

UI

6.64

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 181.73
Q3: 113.63
Median: 7.59
Q1: 3.82
Min: -5.39

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	UI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.58	1.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.50	0.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	0.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	6.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNOW vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNOW vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.80%
Q3: 1.74%
Median: 0.62%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UI

0.62%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 3.88%
Q3: 2.75%
Median: 0.93%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 147.75%
Q3: 63.58%
Median: 24.63%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UI

26.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 111.16%
Q3: 55.91%
Median: 28.42%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.41% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	UI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	26.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 41.55
Q3: 31.54
Median: 23.25
Q1: 18.12
Min: 6.57

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

UI

42.74

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 57.30
Q3: 47.92
Median: 27.50
Q1: 17.89
Min: 13.89

UI’s P/E Ratio of 42.74 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

16.88

IT Services Industry

Max: 6.61
Q3: 4.37
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 16.88, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UI

10.11

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 11.03
Q3: 5.53
Median: 2.20
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.40

UI’s P/S Ratio of 10.11 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

22.13

IT Services Industry

Max: 11.19
Q3: 6.38
Median: 3.47
Q1: 2.31
Min: 0.96

At 22.13, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UI

43.03

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.60
Median: 3.73
Q1: 2.67
Min: 0.30

At 43.03, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SNOW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	UI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	42.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	16.88	10.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	22.13	43.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	88.05	32.03