SNOW vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at SNOW and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
Company Name	Snowflake Inc.	Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Communication Services
GICS Industry	IT Services	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	64.96 billion USD	42.77 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	September 16, 2020	April 15, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNOW and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNOW vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
5-Day Price Return	1.06%	1.52%
13-Week Price Return	-4.18%	2.58%
26-Week Price Return	4.35%	7.74%
52-Week Price Return	68.98%	46.08%
Month-to-Date Return	-12.89%	4.09%
Year-to-Date Return	26.08%	25.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.51M	1.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.34M	2.15M
3-Month Volatility	41.57%	21.00%
Beta	1.24	1.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNOW

-44.88%

IT Services Industry

Max: 29.51%
Q3: 16.98%
Median: 13.47%
Q1: 7.93%
Min: -3.97%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -44.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-36.43%

IT Services Industry

Max: 19.82%
Q3: 11.49%
Median: 6.67%
Q1: 3.61%
Min: -4.62%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -36.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-41.37%

IT Services Industry

Max: 21.69%
Q3: 14.50%
Median: 10.06%
Q1: 6.98%
Min: 0.06%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)	-44.88%	-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-17.30%	-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-36.43%	-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-41.37%	-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	66.58%	56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

1.58

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.42
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.47
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.44

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

0.94

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 144.50
Q3: 84.49
Median: 13.76
Q1: 2.59
Min: -28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.58	1.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.50	1.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	0.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNOW vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNOW vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.80%
Q3: 1.74%
Median: 0.62%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 147.75%
Q3: 63.58%
Median: 24.63%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 41.55
Q3: 31.54
Median: 23.25
Q1: 18.12
Min: 6.57

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

TTWO

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

16.88

IT Services Industry

Max: 6.61
Q3: 4.37
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 16.88, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

22.13

IT Services Industry

Max: 11.19
Q3: 6.38
Median: 3.47
Q1: 2.31
Min: 0.96

At 22.13, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SNOW vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	TTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	16.88	7.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	22.13	12.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	88.05	187.28