SNOW vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 26, 2025

Here’s a clear look at SNOW and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SNOW is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
Company Name	Snowflake Inc.	Sony Group Corporation
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	IT Services	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	65.67 billion USD	168.52 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 16, 2020	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNOW and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNOW vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
5-Day Price Return	-0.72%	0.92%
13-Week Price Return	9.88%	15.46%
26-Week Price Return	2.09%	19.67%
52-Week Price Return	45.72%	13.72%
Month-to-Date Return	-11.94%	13.20%
Year-to-Date Return	27.46%	23.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.66M	18.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.32M	14.80M
3-Month Volatility	41.72%	31.61%
Beta	1.24	1.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNOW

-44.88%

IT Services Industry

Max: 29.51%
Q3: 16.98%
Median: 13.47%
Q1: 7.93%
Min: -3.97%

SNOW has a negative Return on Equity of -44.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-36.43%

IT Services Industry

Max: 19.82%
Q3: 11.49%
Median: 6.67%
Q1: 3.61%
Min: -4.62%

SNOW has a negative Net Profit Margin of -36.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNOW

-41.37%

IT Services Industry

Max: 21.69%
Q3: 14.50%
Median: 10.06%
Q1: 6.98%
Min: 0.06%

SNOW has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.37%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
Return on Equity (TTM)	-44.88%	14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-17.30%	3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-36.43%	9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-41.37%	11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	66.58%	31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

1.58

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.42
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.47
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.44

SNOW’s Current Ratio of 1.58 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

0.94

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

SNOW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 144.50
Q3: 84.49
Median: 13.76
Q1: 2.59
Min: -28.13

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.58	1.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.50	1.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	0.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNOW vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNOW vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 2.80%
Q3: 1.74%
Median: 0.62%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.47%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max: 147.75%
Q3: 63.58%
Median: 24.63%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SNOW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

IT Services Industry

Max: 41.55
Q3: 31.54
Median: 23.25
Q1: 18.12
Min: 6.57

P/E Ratio data for SNOW is currently unavailable.

SONY

22.21

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

A P/E Ratio of 22.21 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNOW

16.88

IT Services Industry

Max: 6.61
Q3: 4.37
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 16.88, SNOW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SONY

2.03

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNOW

22.13

IT Services Industry

Max: 11.19
Q3: 6.38
Median: 3.47
Q1: 2.31
Min: 0.96

At 22.13, SNOW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SNOW vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	SNOW	SONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	22.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	16.88	2.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	22.13	2.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	88.05	12.66