SNN vs. UHS: Smith & Nephew vs. Universal Health Services Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Smith & Nephew (SNN) and Universal Health Services (UHS) both fall under the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group, but SNN is classified in Health Care Equipment & Supplies while UHS is classified in Health Care Providers & Services.

Universal Health Services (UHS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Smith & Nephew (SNN) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 19.74% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 11.85% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for UHS.

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 10.08% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Universal Health Services (UHS) at 7.97%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 14.47% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.60%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 6.09% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 9.71% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 52.34% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 37.34% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 2.14 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.37 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 0.73 and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 1.24% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.10% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

Both Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 53.20% and Universal Health Services (UHS) at 3.35% pay out more of their earnings than any of their industry peers — the thinnest cover in their groups, so dividend headroom deserves attention.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 8.18 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 21.19 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for UHS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 0.63 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 2.07 prices around its industry’s middle — UHS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Universal Health Services (UHS) at 1.51 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Smith & Nephew (SNN) at 12.80 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics