Seek Returns logo

SNA vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SNA and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSNASTN
Company NameSnap-on IncorporatedStantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization17.22 billion USD12.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SNA and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SNA vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSNASTN
5-Day Price Return2.75%2.18%
13-Week Price Return1.37%6.30%
26-Week Price Return-1.69%38.04%
52-Week Price Return16.69%32.09%
Month-to-Date Return2.81%-0.72%
Year-to-Date Return-2.73%33.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.24M0.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M0.28M
3-Month Volatility24.09%16.54%
Beta0.791.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SNA

18.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.10% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SNA

19.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.72% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SNA

25.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.57% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSNASTN
Return on Equity (TTM)18.10%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.45%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.72%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.57%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.96%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

4.48

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSNASTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.481.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.231.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.210.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)65.1560.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

SNA vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SNA vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SNA

2.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SNA

43.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.42% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSNASTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.42%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SNA

16.89

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 16.89 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

38.90

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 38.90, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SNA

3.33

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN

2.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.76 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SNA

2.85

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 2.85 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SNA vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSNASTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.8938.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.332.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.854.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.5327.08