Seek Returns logo

SN vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SN and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SN is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolSNVIPS
Company NameSharkNinja, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization16.50 billion USD8.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 31, 2023March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SN and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SN vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSNVIPS
5-Day Price Return-2.01%2.62%
13-Week Price Return20.18%19.53%
26-Week Price Return6.21%17.18%
52-Week Price Return27.99%35.91%
Month-to-Date Return0.71%14.38%
Year-to-Date Return20.09%28.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.64M3.20M
3-Month Volatility36.64%27.56%
Beta1.690.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSNVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)26.00%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.96%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.82%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.88%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.39%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSNVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.941.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.071.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.340.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.98150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

SN vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SN vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSNVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SN

32.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

At 32.37, SN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Durables industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SN

2.85

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.85, SN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSNVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.377.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.850.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.321.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.62--