Seek Returns logo

SN vs. TCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SN and TCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SN is a standard domestic listing, while TCOM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolSNTCOM
Company NameSharkNinja, Inc.Trip.com Group Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization14.54 billion USD48.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 31, 2023December 9, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SN and TCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SN vs. TCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSNTCOM
5-Day Price Return-4.17%-1.49%
13-Week Price Return4.20%29.00%
26-Week Price Return14.90%21.04%
52-Week Price Return-2.69%24.59%
Month-to-Date Return-11.81%3.11%
Year-to-Date Return5.95%10.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.59M1.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.54M2.39M
3-Month Volatility31.73%27.41%
Beta1.761.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TCOM

12.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

TCOM’s Return on Equity of 12.21% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TCOM

32.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

TCOM’s Net Profit Margin of 32.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TCOM

26.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.60% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSNTCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)26.00%12.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.96%6.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.82%32.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.88%26.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.39%81.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TCOM

1.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

TCOM’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TCOM

0.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TCOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TCOM

9.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

TCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSNTCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.941.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.071.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.340.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.989.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

SN vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SN vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSNTCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SN

27.31

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 27.31 places SN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TCOM

21.11

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

TCOM’s P/E Ratio of 21.11 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SN

2.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

SN’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TCOM

6.74

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

TCOM’s P/S Ratio of 6.74 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TCOM

2.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

TCOM’s P/B Ratio of 2.12 is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SN vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSNTCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.3121.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.416.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.322.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.89--