Seek Returns logo

SMR vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SMR and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSMRVST
Company NameNuScale Power CorporationVistra Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsUtilities
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization4.52 billion USD65.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 1, 2022October 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SMR and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SMR vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSMRVST
5-Day Price Return-5.96%-4.67%
13-Week Price Return37.81%22.62%
26-Week Price Return36.75%16.46%
52-Week Price Return258.70%138.93%
Month-to-Date Return-32.70%-7.50%
Year-to-Date Return88.46%39.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.54M4.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.56M5.38M
3-Month Volatility108.54%39.49%
Beta2.091.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SMR

-22.81%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -22.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
30.49%
Q3
14.63%
Median
7.41%
Q1
3.67%
Min
-8.17%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SMR

-221.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -221.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
32.12%
Q3
16.71%
Median
10.67%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-6.37%

VST’s Net Profit Margin of 14.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SMR

-233.90%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -233.90%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
42.59%
Q3
29.96%
Median
18.17%
Q1
12.79%
Min
4.70%

VST’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% is around the midpoint for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSMRVST
Return on Equity (TTM)-22.81%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)-24.54%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-221.07%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-233.90%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.50%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SMR

4.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

SMR’s Current Ratio of 4.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.21
Median
0.86
Q1
0.62
Min
0.25

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.93
Q3
2.66
Median
1.75
Q1
1.05
Min
0.22

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00, VST operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSMRVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.220.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.180.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.004.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-58.595.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

SMR vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SMR vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VST

0.77%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
8.02%
Q3
5.65%
Median
4.08%
Q1
2.47%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
125.56%
Q3
90.24%
Median
50.41%
Q1
17.76%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSMRVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

VST

27.39

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
51.94
Q3
27.00
Median
10.10
Q1
7.02
Min
4.18

A P/E Ratio of 27.39 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SMR

171.50

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

With a P/S Ratio of 171.50, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VST

4.09

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
6.94
Q3
3.56
Median
2.46
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.09 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SMR

16.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 16.24, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.49
Q3
1.92
Median
1.33
Q1
0.81
Min
0.35

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SMR vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSMRVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--27.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)171.504.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.2413.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--42.40