Seek Returns logo

SHW vs. WLK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SHW and WLK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSHWWLK
Company NameThe Sherwin-Williams CompanyWestlake Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization91.54 billion USD10.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 12, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SHW and WLK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SHW vs. WLK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSHWWLK
5-Day Price Return0.43%-3.26%
13-Week Price Return1.42%3.52%
26-Week Price Return1.66%-26.50%
52-Week Price Return3.13%-43.72%
Month-to-Date Return10.96%4.35%
Year-to-Date Return8.00%-27.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.15M1.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.70M1.25M
3-Month Volatility22.75%48.40%
Beta1.230.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SHW

60.82%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

SHW’s Return on Equity of 60.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WLK

-0.64%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

WLK has a negative Return on Equity of -0.64%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SHW

11.03%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.03% places SHW in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WLK

-0.57%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

WLK has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.57%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SHW

14.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.21% places SHW in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WLK

0.89%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

WLK’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.89% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSHWWLK
Return on Equity (TTM)60.82%-0.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.43%-0.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.03%-0.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.21%0.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.87%11.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SHW

0.78

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

SHW’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WLK

2.47

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

WLK’s Current Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SHW

2.43

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.43, SHW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Chemicals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WLK

0.46

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

WLK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SHW

9.47

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

SHW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WLK

157.33

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 157.33, WLK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSHWWLK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.782.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.430.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.47157.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

SHW vs. WLK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SHW vs. WLK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SHW

0.83%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

SHW’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

WLK

2.53%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

WLK’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SHW

29.89%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

SHW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.89% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WLK

43.85%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

WLK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.85% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSHWWLK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.83%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.89%43.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SHW

35.82

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 35.82 places SHW in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WLK

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

P/E Ratio data for WLK is currently unavailable.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SHW

3.95

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

SHW’s P/S Ratio of 3.95 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WLK

0.91

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

WLK’s P/S Ratio of 0.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SHW

19.55

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 19.55, SHW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WLK

0.95

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

WLK’s P/B Ratio of 0.95 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SHW vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSHWWLK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.82--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.950.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)19.550.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)37.9126.05