Seek Returns logo

SE vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SE and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, YUM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolSEYUM
Company NameSea LimitedYum! Brands, Inc.
CountrySingaporeUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryEntertainmentHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization105.82 billion USD41.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 20, 2017September 17, 1997
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SE and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SE vs. YUM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSEYUM
5-Day Price Return2.72%1.75%
13-Week Price Return9.85%-0.21%
26-Week Price Return34.26%0.40%
52-Week Price Return117.37%9.25%
Month-to-Date Return14.10%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return68.46%11.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.97M2.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.42M2.02M
3-Month Volatility50.35%20.88%
Beta1.550.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

YUM

117.64%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

YUM

18.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

YUM

30.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSEYUM
Return on Equity (TTM)13.69%117.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.11%21.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.17%18.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.63%30.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.96%46.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

YUM

0.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

YUM

30.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

YUM

4.68

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSEYUM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.550.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.390.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.6530.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-6.054.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

SE vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SE vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

YUM

1.91%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

YUM

53.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSEYUM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%53.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

YUM

28.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.18 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

YUM

5.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.10 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

YUM

208.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SE vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSEYUM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)88.7928.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.485.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.79208.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.3826.29