Seek Returns logo

SCI vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SCI and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SCI is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolSCIVIPS
Company NameService Corporation InternationalVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryDiversified Consumer ServicesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization11.36 billion USD8.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SCI and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SCI vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIPS
5-Day Price Return0.38%-3.87%
13-Week Price Return3.62%7.69%
26-Week Price Return-0.61%7.62%
52-Week Price Return7.67%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return6.12%10.40%
Year-to-Date Return1.45%23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.82M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.08M3.29M
3-Month Volatility16.21%30.95%
Beta0.910.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.65%
Q3
29.77%
Median
16.63%
Q1
11.08%
Min
2.26%

SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
18.84%
Q3
13.34%
Median
12.22%
Q1
7.92%
Min
3.76%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
19.23%
Median
15.23%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)32.84%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.05%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.39%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.41%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.97
Median
1.66
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.22
Median
0.36
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
13.44
Q3
10.58
Median
5.57
Q1
3.04
Min
-2.17

SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.611.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.561.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.230.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.62150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

SCI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SCI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SCI

1.57%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
0.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.57%, SCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.57%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.29%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SCI

21.22

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
33.95
Q3
25.14
Median
19.27
Q1
15.30
Min
5.58

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.22 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SCI

2.67

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.29
Q3
2.54
Median
2.27
Q1
1.92
Min
1.28

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper echelon for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.00
Q3
6.37
Median
3.31
Q1
2.13
Min
0.98

At 7.43, SCI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SCI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.227.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.670.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.431.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.99--