Seek Returns logo

SCI vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SCI and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSCIVIK
Company NameService Corporation InternationalViking Holdings Ltd
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryDiversified Consumer ServicesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization11.52 billion USD26.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SCI and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SCI vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIK
5-Day Price Return-1.29%-1.60%
13-Week Price Return0.55%7.93%
26-Week Price Return0.90%41.77%
52-Week Price Return9.48%60.68%
Month-to-Date Return-1.33%-4.28%
Year-to-Date Return2.87%35.04%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.00M2.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M2.83M
3-Month Volatility18.73%23.74%
Beta0.991.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)32.84%--
Return on Assets (TTM)3.05%7.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%14.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.39%21.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.41%42.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.610.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.560.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.2320.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.621.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

SCI vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SCI vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SCI

1.54%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Yield of 1.54% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.54%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.29%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SCI

21.63

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.63 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIK

32.11

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 32.11 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SCI

2.73

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIK

4.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

SCI’s P/B Ratio of 7.43 is in the upper tier for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SCI vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSCIVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6332.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.734.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.4384.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.3418.66