SBAC vs. VTR: SBA Communications vs. Ventas Stock Comparison

Company Profile

SBA Communications (SBAC) and Ventas (VTR) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but SBAC is classified in Specialized REITs while VTR is classified in Health Care REITs.

Both SBA Communications (SBAC) and Ventas (VTR) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ventas (VTR) earns 1.87% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; SBA Communications (SBAC) has no ROE this period.

Neither SBA Communications (SBAC) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for SBA Communications (SBAC) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Ventas (VTR) at 18.47% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while SBA Communications (SBAC) at 5.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VTR.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either SBA Communications (SBAC) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both SBA Communications (SBAC) at 0.19 and Ventas (VTR) at 0.37 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Ventas (VTR) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.77 against its industry range, while SBA Communications (SBAC) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both SBA Communications (SBAC) at 2.52% and Ventas (VTR) at 2.29% offer bottom-quartile dividend income relative to share price versus industry peers.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither SBA Communications (SBAC) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either SBA Communications (SBAC) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

On P/S ratio, both SBA Communications (SBAC) at 6.94 and Ventas (VTR) at 6.96 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

SBA Communications (SBAC) reports a negative P/B ratio of -4.09, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Ventas (VTR) reports 2.97, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics