SARO vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 8, 2025

Here’s a clear look at SARO and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	SARO	VRT
Company Name	StandardAero, Inc.	Vertiv Holdings Co
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	8.90 billion USD	62.17 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 2, 2024	August 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SARO and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SARO vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	SARO	VRT
5-Day Price Return	2.28%	7.91%
13-Week Price Return	-11.72%	28.94%
26-Week Price Return	0.59%	116.29%
52-Week Price Return	--	58.54%
Month-to-Date Return	0.18%	7.91%
Year-to-Date Return	10.42%	43.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.35M	7.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.08M	7.11M
3-Month Volatility	24.79%	46.51%
Beta	1.25	2.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SARO

6.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 37.11%
Q3: 20.14%
Median: 11.72%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -6.24%

SARO’s Return on Equity of 6.27% is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 35.67%
Q3: 23.64%
Median: 11.74%
Q1: 6.08%
Min: -4.39%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SARO

2.37%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.66%
Q3: 8.61%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: 4.92%
Min: 1.01%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, SARO’s Net Profit Margin of 2.37% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.60%
Q3: 10.26%
Median: 5.83%
Q1: 2.92%
Min: -0.75%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SARO

7.59%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 22.35%
Q3: 12.83%
Median: 9.29%
Q1: 6.38%
Min: -2.15%

SARO’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.59% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.24%
Q3: 14.53%
Median: 7.97%
Q1: 3.45%
Min: -5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	SARO	VRT
Return on Equity (TTM)	6.27%	32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.11%	8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.37%	8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.59%	13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	14.90%	35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SARO

2.15

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.77

SARO’s Current Ratio of 2.15 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.31
Q3: 2.09
Median: 1.48
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.85

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SARO

0.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 0.96
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.03

SARO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.92 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.57
Q3: 0.96
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SARO

1.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.08
Median: 7.25
Q1: 2.65
Min: -7.63

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, SARO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.29 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 44.15
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 0.98
Min: -19.47

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	SARO	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.15	1.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.45	1.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.92	0.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.29	2.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

SARO vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SARO vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SARO

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.72%
Q3: 1.45%
Median: 0.48%
Q1: 0.08%
Min: 0.00%

SARO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRT

0.08%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.04%
Q3: 1.58%
Median: 1.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SARO

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 110.40%
Q3: 50.43%
Median: 17.11%
Q1: 0.46%
Min: 0.00%

SARO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 165.68%
Q3: 71.84%
Median: 38.15%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	SARO	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SARO

66.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 67.20
Q3: 55.74
Median: 33.28
Q1: 27.49
Min: 15.02

A P/E Ratio of 66.87 places SARO in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRT

78.17

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 65.02
Q3: 38.99
Median: 27.41
Q1: 19.88
Min: 8.37

At 78.17, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SARO

1.58

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 4.87
Median: 2.47
Q1: 1.61
Min: 0.33

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, SARO’s P/S Ratio of 1.58 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VRT

6.98

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 7.01
Q3: 4.03
Median: 1.79
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SARO

4.21

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.90
Q3: 8.93
Median: 4.70
Q1: 3.03
Min: 0.83

SARO’s P/B Ratio of 4.21 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 10.97
Q3: 5.57
Median: 3.50
Q1: 1.66
Min: 0.64

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SARO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	SARO	VRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	66.87	78.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.58	6.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.21	15.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	--	51.12