Seek Returns logo

SAP vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SAP and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolSAPUBER
Company NameSAP SEUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryGermanyUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareGround Transportation
Market Capitalization314.74 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 18, 1995May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SAP and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SAP vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSAPUBER
5-Day Price Return-1.71%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return-11.32%8.14%
26-Week Price Return-15.82%17.25%
52-Week Price Return19.77%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return-7.26%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return-1.57%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.49M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.55M20.51M
3-Month Volatility25.76%29.36%
Beta0.991.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSAPUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)15.09%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.09%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.23%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.13%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.80%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSAPUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.031.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.210.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)32.64-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

SAP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SAP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SAP

0.99%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSAPUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.99%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)161.64%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SAP

42.26

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 42.26 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SAP

7.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SAP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSAPUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.2615.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.704.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.748.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)37.8122.90