Seek Returns logo

RTO vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RTO and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VRT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolRTOVRT
Company NameRentokil Initial plcVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization12.40 billion USD48.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996August 2, 2018
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RTO and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RTO vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRTOVRT
5-Day Price Return-2.47%-3.76%
13-Week Price Return3.18%19.87%
26-Week Price Return-12.52%16.71%
52-Week Price Return-24.83%61.69%
Month-to-Date Return-4.27%-12.40%
Year-to-Date Return-9.36%12.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.54M6.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.20M7.70M
3-Month Volatility31.78%40.24%
Beta0.931.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRTOVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)6.17%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.38%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.49%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.93%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRTOVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.121.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.031.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.140.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.222.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

RTO vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RTO vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRTOVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.44%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)93.97%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RTO vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRTOVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.3059.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.505.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.6915.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.3239.11