Seek Returns logo

RSG vs. UAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RSG and UAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRSGUAL
Company NameRepublic Services, Inc.United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization70.36 billion USD31.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998February 6, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RSG and UAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RSG vs. UAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRSGUAL
5-Day Price Return1.25%3.44%
13-Week Price Return-6.30%22.34%
26-Week Price Return-9.29%62.86%
52-Week Price Return13.46%65.75%
Month-to-Date Return-1.80%1.65%
Year-to-Date Return12.01%1.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.18M5.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.27M6.26M
3-Month Volatility17.01%45.63%
Beta0.571.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UAL

26.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

UAL’s Return on Equity of 26.43% is on par with the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UAL

5.71%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

UAL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UAL

8.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

UAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRSGUAL
Return on Equity (TTM)18.34%26.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.50%4.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.98%5.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.24%8.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.28%64.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UAL

0.70

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

UAL’s Current Ratio of 0.70 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UAL

2.02

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

UAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02 is typical for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UAL

5.76

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

UAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRSGUAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.660.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.600.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.082.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.105.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

RSG vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RSG vs. UAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RSG

1.03%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRSGUAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.03%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.52%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RSG

32.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 32.69 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UAL

9.63

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

UAL’s P/E Ratio of 9.63 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RSG

4.24

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.24 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UAL

0.55

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

UAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UAL

1.94

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

UAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RSG vs. UAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRSGUAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.699.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.240.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.401.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.487.88