Seek Returns logo

RSG vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RSG and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRSGSTN
Company NameRepublic Services, Inc.Stantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization71.25 billion USD12.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RSG and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RSG vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRSGSTN
5-Day Price Return0.91%0.75%
13-Week Price Return-6.95%-0.08%
26-Week Price Return-3.48%25.47%
52-Week Price Return15.10%38.00%
Month-to-Date Return-1.92%0.54%
Year-to-Date Return14.07%33.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M0.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.30M0.29M
3-Month Volatility17.73%19.69%
Beta0.590.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRSGSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)18.34%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.50%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.98%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.24%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.28%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRSGSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.661.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.601.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.080.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.1060.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

RSG vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RSG vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RSG

1.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 1.00% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRSGSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.00%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.52%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RSG

33.47

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 33.47 places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

STN

39.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 39.20 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RSG

4.35

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN

2.78

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RSG vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRSGSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.4739.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.352.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.404.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.1927.29