Seek Returns logo

ROP vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROP and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolROPXYL
Company NameRoper Technologies, Inc.Xylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareMachinery
Market Capitalization57.07 billion USD34.73 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 13, 1992October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROP and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROP vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROPXYL
5-Day Price Return-0.43%0.59%
13-Week Price Return-6.81%13.89%
26-Week Price Return-8.10%9.53%
52-Week Price Return-2.87%5.35%
Month-to-Date Return-3.65%-1.35%
Year-to-Date Return2.01%22.97%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.88M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.60M1.33M
3-Month Volatility15.88%25.25%
Beta1.031.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROPXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)8.08%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.83%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.62%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.06%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.87%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97, ROP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROPXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.461.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.431.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.450.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)80.9755.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROP vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROP vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROP

0.58%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROPXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.58%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.99%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROP

37.65

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 37.65 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROP

7.76

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROP vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROPXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.6537.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.764.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.102.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.3940.41