Seek Returns logo

ROL vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROL and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ROL is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolROLXPEV
Company NameRollins, Inc.XPeng Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization28.32 billion USD22.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 27, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROL and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROL vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROLXPEV
5-Day Price Return4.69%6.52%
13-Week Price Return4.11%29.79%
26-Week Price Return10.73%17.33%
52-Week Price Return17.60%94.58%
Month-to-Date Return3.89%1.20%
Year-to-Date Return26.73%100.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M7.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.65M7.50M
3-Month Volatility20.04%47.34%
Beta0.721.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XPEV

-13.77%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -13.77%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROLXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)35.93%-13.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.64%-5.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.70%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.14%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.69%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XPEV

1.14

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPEV

0.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROLXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.681.14
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.77-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROL vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROL vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROL

1.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROLXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.12%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.80%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROL

56.92

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 56.92 places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROL

7.80

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.80, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XPEV

3.24

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 3.24, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XPEV

4.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

At 4.00, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROLXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.92--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.803.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.944.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.1015.86