Seek Returns logo

ROL vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROL and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolROLSW
Company NameRollins, Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorIndustrialsMaterials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization27.40 billion USD24.73 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROL and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROL vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROLSW
5-Day Price Return-0.18%3.11%
13-Week Price Return-0.67%7.86%
26-Week Price Return10.04%-10.62%
52-Week Price Return12.52%0.62%
Month-to-Date Return-1.27%6.71%
Year-to-Date Return21.98%-12.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.44M4.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.75M3.70M
3-Month Volatility17.46%33.31%
Beta0.691.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROLSW
Return on Equity (TTM)35.93%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.64%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.70%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.14%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.69%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROLSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.681.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.772.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROL vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROL vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROL

1.10%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.10% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SW

3.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROLSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.10%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.80%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROL

57.88

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

At 57.88, ROL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SW

41.59

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 41.59, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROL

7.93

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 7.93, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SW

0.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ROL vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROLSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.8841.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.930.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.941.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.8442.07