Seek Returns logo

ROL vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROL and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ROL is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolROLSE
Company NameRollins, Inc.Sea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorIndustrialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesEntertainment
Market Capitalization28.32 billion USD105.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROL and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROL vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROLSE
5-Day Price Return1.78%2.72%
13-Week Price Return1.76%9.85%
26-Week Price Return12.56%34.26%
52-Week Price Return18.95%117.37%
Month-to-Date Return2.04%14.10%
Year-to-Date Return26.08%68.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.19M5.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.78M4.42M
3-Month Volatility16.99%50.35%
Beta0.691.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROLSE
Return on Equity (TTM)35.93%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.64%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.70%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.14%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.69%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROLSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.681.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.77-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROL vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROL vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROL

1.10%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.10% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROLSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.10%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.80%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROL

57.88

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

At 57.88, ROL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROL

7.93

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 7.93, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ROL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROLSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.8888.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.935.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.949.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.8432.38