Seek Returns logo

ROKU vs. Z: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROKU and Z, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolROKUZ
Company NameRoku, Inc.Zillow Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesReal Estate
GICS IndustryEntertainmentReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization13.03 billion USD19.46 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 28, 2017August 3, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROKU and Z by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROKU vs. Z: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROKUZ
5-Day Price Return1.10%-4.89%
13-Week Price Return24.90%19.63%
26-Week Price Return1.92%3.04%
52-Week Price Return42.79%45.86%
Month-to-Date Return-6.04%1.95%
Year-to-Date Return19.01%9.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.57M3.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.98M2.34M
3-Month Volatility50.79%31.31%
Beta2.162.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROKU

-2.44%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

ROKU has a negative Return on Equity of -2.44%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

Z

-1.30%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

Z has a negative Return on Equity of -1.30%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROKU

-1.40%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

ROKU has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

Z

-2.60%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

Z has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.60%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROKU

-3.55%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

ROKU has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.55%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

Z

-5.61%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

Z has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROKUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.44%-1.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.44%-1.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.40%-2.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.55%-5.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.04%75.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROKU

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

ROKU’s Current Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

Z

3.34

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

Z’s Current Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROKU

0.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, ROKU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

Z

0.05

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, Z’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROKU

-93.67

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

ROKU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -93.67. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

Z

-1.97

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

Z has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.97. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROKUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.853.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.603.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-93.67-1.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROKU vs. Z: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROKU vs. Z: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROKU

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROKU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

Z

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

Z currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROKU

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROKU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

Z

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

Z has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROKUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROKU

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for ROKU is currently unavailable.

Z

--

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

P/E Ratio data for Z is currently unavailable.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROKU

2.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, ROKU’s P/S Ratio of 2.98 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

Z

8.01

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

Z’s P/S Ratio of 8.01 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROKU

4.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

ROKU’s P/B Ratio of 4.98 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

Z

3.54

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.54, Z’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROKU vs. Z: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROKUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.988.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.983.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.6475.01