Seek Returns logo

ROK vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ROK and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolROKVRSK
Company NameRockwell Automation, Inc.Verisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentProfessional Services
Market Capitalization38.18 billion USD37.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ROK and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ROK vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolROKVRSK
5-Day Price Return-2.27%1.18%
13-Week Price Return10.19%-13.84%
26-Week Price Return13.71%-8.34%
52-Week Price Return28.06%0.62%
Month-to-Date Return-3.44%-2.82%
Year-to-Date Return18.84%-1.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.04M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.96M0.93M
3-Month Volatility21.10%21.38%
Beta1.420.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ROK

28.15%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, ROK’s Return on Equity of 28.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ROK

12.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.03% places ROK in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ROK

13.99%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

ROK’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.99% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolROKVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)28.15%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.75%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.03%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.99%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.43%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ROK

1.06

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

ROK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ROK

1.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ROK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electrical Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ROK

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ROK is currently unavailable.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolROKVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.0010.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--43.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

ROK vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ROK vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ROK

1.52%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ROK

60.38%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.38% is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolROKVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.52%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.38%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ROK

39.64

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

ROK’s P/E Ratio of 39.64 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ROK

4.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

ROK’s P/S Ratio of 4.77 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ROK

10.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 10.81, ROK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROK vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolROKVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.6441.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.7712.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.81139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.1337.30