Seek Returns logo

RMD vs. ZTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RMD and ZTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRMDZTS
Company NameResMed Inc.Zoetis Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization40.79 billion USD64.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 2, 1995February 1, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RMD and ZTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RMD vs. ZTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRMDZTS
5-Day Price Return2.78%2.35%
13-Week Price Return8.42%-8.02%
26-Week Price Return24.45%-11.07%
52-Week Price Return16.63%-23.92%
Month-to-Date Return1.78%0.07%
Year-to-Date Return21.82%-10.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.87M3.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.93M3.04M
3-Month Volatility21.84%19.64%
Beta0.880.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RMD

25.51%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, RMD’s Return on Equity of 25.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZTS

53.21%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

ZTS’s Return on Equity of 53.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RMD

27.22%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

RMD’s Net Profit Margin of 27.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ZTS

27.83%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.83% places ZTS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RMD

32.75%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

RMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ZTS

35.35%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.35% places ZTS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRMDZTS
Return on Equity (TTM)25.51%53.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.61%18.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.22%27.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.75%35.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.33%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

3.44

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

RMD’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ZTS

1.76

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

ZTS’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

0.11

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, RMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZTS

1.32

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

ZTS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RMD

661.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 661.20, RMD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ZTS

15.44

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

ZTS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRMDZTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.441.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.161.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.111.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)661.2015.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

RMD vs. ZTS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RMD vs. ZTS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RMD

0.76%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RMD’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTS

1.29%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

ZTS’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RMD

22.19%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RMD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTS

32.08%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

ZTS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.08% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRMDZTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.19%32.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RMD

29.18

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

RMD’s P/E Ratio of 29.18 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZTS

24.86

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

ZTS’s P/E Ratio of 24.86 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RMD

7.94

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

RMD’s P/S Ratio of 7.94 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZTS

6.92

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

ZTS’s P/S Ratio of 6.92 is in the upper echelon for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

6.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

RMD’s P/B Ratio of 6.34 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZTS

13.95

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

At 13.95, ZTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RMD vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRMDZTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.1824.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.946.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.3413.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.7629.26