Seek Returns logo

RMD vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RMD and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RMD is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolRMDTEVA
Company NameResMed Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization42.32 billion USD20.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 2, 1995February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RMD and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RMD vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRMDTEVA
5-Day Price Return1.52%1.08%
13-Week Price Return14.10%0.07%
26-Week Price Return20.70%1.60%
52-Week Price Return24.97%-11.57%
Month-to-Date Return6.30%6.92%
Year-to-Date Return26.40%-26.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.92M2.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M2.25M
3-Month Volatility18.28%23.35%
Beta0.84-0.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RMD

25.51%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, RMD’s Return on Equity of 25.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RMD

27.22%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

RMD’s Net Profit Margin of 27.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RMD

32.75%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

RMD’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRMDTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)25.51%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.61%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.22%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.75%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.33%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

3.44

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

RMD’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

0.11

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, RMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RMD

661.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 661.20, RMD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRMDTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.441.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.160.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.112.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)661.20-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

RMD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RMD vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RMD

0.74%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RMD’s Dividend Yield of 0.74% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RMD

22.19%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RMD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRMDTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.74%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.19%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RMD

30.13

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

RMD’s P/E Ratio of 30.13 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RMD

8.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

RMD’s P/S Ratio of 8.20 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TEVA

1.25

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RMD

6.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

RMD’s P/B Ratio of 6.34 is in the upper tier for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TEVA

2.80

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.80 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RMD vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRMDTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.13--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.201.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.342.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.5718.48