Seek Returns logo

RL vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RL and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RL is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolRLXPEV
Company NameRalph Lauren CorporationXPeng Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization17.85 billion USD22.58 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 1997August 27, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRLXPEV
5-Day Price Return3.22%-0.22%
13-Week Price Return2.94%17.43%
26-Week Price Return6.11%23.37%
52-Week Price Return72.16%202.26%
Month-to-Date Return-1.38%24.66%
Year-to-Date Return27.56%92.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M13.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.73M7.58M
3-Month Volatility28.32%52.84%
Beta1.642.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRLXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)29.90%-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.78%-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.49%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.17%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.55%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRLXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.781.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.38-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.16%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRLXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.07%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

23.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RL vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRLXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.39--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.452.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.274.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.05--