RL vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at RL and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RL is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	RL	VIPS
Company Name	Ralph Lauren Corporation	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	17.34 billion USD	8.21 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 12, 1997	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	RL	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	-1.44%	-3.87%
13-Week Price Return	3.08%	7.69%
26-Week Price Return	2.76%	7.62%
52-Week Price Return	71.38%	18.83%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.19%	10.40%
Year-to-Date Return	23.92%	23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.84M	3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.75M	3.29M
3-Month Volatility	28.75%	30.95%
Beta	1.65	0.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 49.17%
Q3: 28.98%
Median: 19.22%
Q1: 10.86%
Min: -11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 11.90%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: 0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.23%
Q3: 15.96%
Median: 11.13%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: 1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	RL	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.90%	18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.78%	10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.49%	6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.17%	8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	68.55%	23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.34
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 20.63
Median: 11.28
Q1: 4.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	RL	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.78	1.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.54	0.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	85.38	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.16%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.46%
Q3: 2.38%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 131.17%
Q3: 63.48%
Median: 29.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	RL	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.16%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.07%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

23.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 66.12
Q3: 35.17
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.47
Min: 5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.40
Q3: 3.33
Median: 2.04
Q1: 0.80
Min: 0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 5.22
Median: 3.48
Q1: 1.90
Min: 0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RL vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	RL	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	23.39	7.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.45	0.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.27	1.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	17.05	--