RL vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 31, 2025

Here’s a clear look at RL and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RL is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	RL	TM
Company Name	Ralph Lauren Corporation	Toyota Motor Corporation
Country	United States	Japan
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	18.03 billion USD	258.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 12, 1997	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	RL	TM
5-Day Price Return	3.32%	-2.28%
13-Week Price Return	6.91%	5.06%
26-Week Price Return	10.72%	6.00%
52-Week Price Return	75.21%	14.38%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.61%	6.55%
Year-to-Date Return	28.55%	-8.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.56M	20.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.72M	28.78M
3-Month Volatility	27.01%	36.81%
Beta	1.65	1.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 53.33%
Q3: 26.13%
Median: 18.47%
Q1: 7.99%
Min: -10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 23.35%
Q3: 13.49%
Median: 8.45%
Q1: 4.18%
Min: -3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 13.00%
Q1: 7.02%
Min: -3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	RL	TM
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.90%	12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.78%	4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.49%	8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.17%	9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	68.55%	19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 3.91
Q3: 2.49
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.67
Q3: 1.29
Median: 0.59
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 35.85
Median: 9.20
Q1: 4.29
Min: -32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TM

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	RL	TM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.78	1.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.54	1.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	85.38	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.16%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 2.59%
Q1: 0.95%
Min: 0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 195.44%
Q3: 106.47%
Median: 58.77%
Q1: 36.52%
Min: 0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	RL	TM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.16%	3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	27.07%	38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

23.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 63.29
Q3: 34.64
Median: 18.01
Q1: 13.88
Min: 6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM

8.93

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.46
Q3: 3.13
Median: 1.72
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM

0.79

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.76
Q3: 6.00
Median: 3.26
Q1: 1.97
Min: 0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RL vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	RL	TM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	23.39	8.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.45	0.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.27	1.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	17.05	52.42