Seek Returns logo

RL vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RL and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRLSN
Company NameRalph Lauren CorporationSharkNinja, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization18.90 billion USD14.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 1997July 31, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRLSN
5-Day Price Return0.50%-4.17%
13-Week Price Return14.32%4.20%
26-Week Price Return37.06%14.90%
52-Week Price Return59.55%-2.69%
Month-to-Date Return5.60%-11.81%
Year-to-Date Return35.75%5.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.71M1.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.69M1.54M
3-Month Volatility28.65%31.73%
Beta1.651.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

31.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 31.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.91%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.69%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.69% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRLSN
Return on Equity (TTM)31.52%26.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.08%11.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.91%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.69%11.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.03%48.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.75

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRLSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.841.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.251.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.750.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.389.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.08%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.08% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

25.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRLSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.08%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.71%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

23.90

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.90 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SN

27.31

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 27.31 places SN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SN

2.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

SN’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

6.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

RL’s P/B Ratio of 6.61 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RL vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRLSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.9027.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.612.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.616.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.6430.89