Seek Returns logo

RL vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RL and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

RL is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolRLSE
Company NameRalph Lauren CorporationSea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsEntertainment
Market Capitalization17.85 billion USD108.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 1997October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RL and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RL vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRLSE
5-Day Price Return3.22%1.84%
13-Week Price Return2.94%10.69%
26-Week Price Return6.11%43.32%
52-Week Price Return72.16%120.88%
Month-to-Date Return-1.38%16.76%
Year-to-Date Return27.56%72.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M3.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.73M4.37M
3-Month Volatility28.32%50.84%
Beta1.641.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRLSE
Return on Equity (TTM)29.90%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.78%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.49%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.17%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.55%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRLSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.781.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.291.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)85.38-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

RL vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RL vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RL

1.16%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRLSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.16%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.07%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RL

23.39

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SE

88.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 88.79, SE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RL

2.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SE

5.48

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RL vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRLSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.3988.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.455.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.279.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.0532.38