RKT vs. V: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at RKT and V, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	RKT	V
Company Name	Rocket Companies, Inc.	Visa Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	37.49 billion USD	667.55 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	August 6, 2020	March 19, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RKT and V by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RKT vs. V: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	RKT	V
5-Day Price Return	-5.13%	-0.45%
13-Week Price Return	37.14%	-6.52%
26-Week Price Return	38.10%	-3.29%
52-Week Price Return	-7.45%	29.07%
Month-to-Date Return	20.24%	-0.45%
Year-to-Date Return	57.73%	8.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume	16.97M	5.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume	15.96M	6.27M
3-Month Volatility	58.40%	21.27%
Beta	2.23	0.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	RKT	V
Return on Equity (TTM)	-0.01%	52.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.00%	21.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-0.01%	52.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.77%	62.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	80.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	RKT	V
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.40	1.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.40	1.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.69	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.42	24.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

RKT vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RKT vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	RKT	V
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	22.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

V

32.82

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

A P/E Ratio of 32.82 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RKT

7.31

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

V

17.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKT vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	RKT	V
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	32.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.31	17.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.81	17.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	20.65	30.15