Seek Returns logo

RKLB vs. WM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RKLB and WM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRKLBWM
Company NameRocket Lab CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization22.78 billion USD90.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 24, 2020June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RKLB and WM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RKLB vs. WM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRKLBWM
5-Day Price Return15.40%-1.95%
13-Week Price Return82.88%-3.98%
26-Week Price Return82.11%-1.96%
52-Week Price Return590.35%6.62%
Month-to-Date Return2.83%-2.23%
Year-to-Date Return85.39%11.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.77M2.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.77M1.71M
3-Month Volatility74.57%16.66%
Beta2.200.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RKLB

-48.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -48.14%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

WM

31.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, WM’s Return on Equity of 31.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RKLB

-45.87%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -45.87%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

WM

11.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.36% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RKLB

-44.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -44.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

WM

17.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.52% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRKLBWM
Return on Equity (TTM)-48.14%31.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)-17.98%6.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-45.87%11.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-44.08%17.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.04%39.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RKLB

2.67

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WM

0.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

WM’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RKLB

0.63

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WM

2.61

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.61, WM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

WM

6.82

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

WM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRKLBWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.670.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.210.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.632.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-45.876.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

RKLB vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RKLB vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WM

1.37%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WM

46.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRKLBWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%46.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

WM

34.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

WM’s P/E Ratio of 34.02 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RKLB

38.93

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 38.93, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WM

3.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

WM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RKLB

23.97

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 23.97, RKLB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WM

10.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 10.01, WM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRKLBWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--34.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)38.933.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)23.9710.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--42.79