Seek Returns logo

RIVN vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RIVN and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRIVNSN
Company NameRivian Automotive, Inc.SharkNinja, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization15.91 billion USD16.34 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 10, 2021July 31, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RIVN and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RIVN vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRIVNSN
5-Day Price Return7.02%-2.97%
13-Week Price Return-17.60%21.42%
26-Week Price Return-5.89%3.25%
52-Week Price Return2.34%28.45%
Month-to-Date Return1.86%-0.26%
Year-to-Date Return-1.43%18.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume43.51M1.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume34.04M1.64M
3-Month Volatility39.99%36.04%
Beta1.841.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RIVN

-56.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RIVN has a negative Return on Equity of -56.67%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SN

26.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.00% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RIVN

-68.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RIVN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -68.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SN

8.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

SN’s Net Profit Margin of 8.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RIVN

-72.04%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RIVN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.04%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SN

11.88%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRIVNSN
Return on Equity (TTM)-56.67%26.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.08%11.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-68.06%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-72.04%11.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-4.91%48.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RIVN

3.44

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RIVN’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SN

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RIVN

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RIVN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SN

0.34

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RIVN

-179.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

RIVN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -179.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRIVNSN
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.441.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.721.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.730.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-179.319.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

RIVN vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RIVN vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIVN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RIVN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRIVNSN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RIVN

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for RIVN is currently unavailable.

SN

32.37

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

At 32.37, SN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Durables industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RIVN

2.84

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.84, RIVN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SN

2.85

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.85, SN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RIVN

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

RIVN’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SN

6.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 6.32, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RIVN vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobiles and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRIVNSN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--32.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.842.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.716.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--36.62