Seek Returns logo

RGC vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at RGC and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolRGCTEM
Company NameRegencell Bioscience Holdings LimitedTempus AI, Inc.
CountryHong KongUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization7.83 billion USD14.86 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 16, 2021June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of RGC and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

RGC vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolRGCTEM
5-Day Price Return5.97%1.87%
13-Week Price Return-9.33%27.02%
26-Week Price Return1,414.71%51.57%
52-Week Price Return10,200.00%49.91%
Month-to-Date Return9.96%6.39%
Year-to-Date Return11,784.62%139.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.19M9.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.06M11.10M
3-Month Volatility266.49%64.23%
Beta2.253.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

RGC

-54.75%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

RGC has a negative Return on Equity of -54.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

Net Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

Operating Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolRGCTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)-54.75%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)-51.38%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)---20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)---24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

RGC

42.68

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

RGC’s Current Ratio of 42.68 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

RGC

0.00

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, RGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolRGCTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)42.681.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)41.891.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

RGC vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

RGC vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

RGC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

RGC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolRGCTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

P/E Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

P/S Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

TEM

16.06

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

With a P/S Ratio of 16.06, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

RGC

9.57

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

RGC’s P/B Ratio of 9.57 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RGC vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolRGCTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)--16.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.5735.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)----